ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Endoscopic characteristics and clinical outcomes of squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma in the anal canal.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Squamous epithelial lesions, including low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs and HSILs) and anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), are rare diseases. Consequently, few reports have precisely characterized their endoscopic features or reported clinical outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this case series, we describe detailed endoscopic characteristics and clinical outcomes of squamous epithelial lesions. Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective case series. Data from a consecutive series of patients who underwent ESD for squamous epithelial lesions between 2014 and 2024 were retrieved from the integrated database. Two expert endoscopists reviewed endoscopy images. Diagnostic performance of the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) classification was also investigated. Results: A total of 18 lesions from 11 patients were identified. Diagnoses after ESD were as follows: LSIL in three lesions, HSIL in 12 lesions, and ASCC in three lesions. LSILs appeared as slightly elevated lesions with whitish, papillomatous surfaces and exhibited Type A vessels. HSILs were flat or slightly elevated and showed Type B1 vessels. ASCCs presented with reddish or protruding components and exhibited Type B2 or B3 vessels at the regions. Diagnostic accuracy of JES classification was 92% (11/12; 95% confidence interval 65-99). En bloc and complete resection rates were 100% and 56%, respectively. There was no local recurrence or distant metastasis with median follow-up 12 months. Conclusions: Anal squamous epithelial lesions demonstrated characteristic findings. JES classification using magnifying narrow-band imaging might be useful, although limitations remain in detecting flat HSILs in the anal transitional zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.