ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Efficacy of next-generation endoscopy training simulator in improving international trainee endoscopic submucosal dissection skills.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Off-the-job training (OFF-JT) ensures that all trainees receive a standardized level of ESD training, regardless of the clinical workload or the regional context. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of OFF-JT using a next-generation laptop-based mock-up endoscopy simulator (NLMES) in improving endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) skills among international trainees. Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective pilot study employing a crossover design. International trainees in Group A underwent designated NLMES training and ESD observation during the early phase (Days 1-14), followed by ESD observation during the late phase (Days 15-28), whereas those in Group B followed the reverse schedule. On Days 1, 15, and 29, the trainees performed ESD using a biomaterial-free ESD model, and the ESD skills were assessed at each time point. The primary endpoint was the between-group comparison of improvement in dissection speed on Day 15. Results: A total of 10 international trainees were enrolled in this study. On Day 15, the improvement in dissection speed was greater in Group A than in Group B, although the statistical difference was not significant (6.40 mm Conclusions: OFF-JT using NLMES might be a promising approach improving international trainee ESD skills. Dissection speed increased during the period when NLMES training was received, highlighting the importance of OFF-JT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.