ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Interpretable machine learning models for pre- and postoperative prediction of early intra-abdominal infections after liver transplantation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning Predictive Models for Surgical Site Infections: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early intra-abdominal infections (EIAIs) are among the most frequent and life-threatening complications following liver transplantation (LT). Early identification of high-risk patients remains challenging, and no standardized risk stratification tool is currently available. Objective: To develop and externally validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models for preoperative and postoperative prediction of EIAIs after LT. Design: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Methods: A total of 363 adult LT recipients were included (Center 1: Results: The stacking models demonstrated superior performance. For pre-LIFT, the areas under receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) curves (AUCs) were 0.995 ± 0.004 (training), 0.818 ± 0.056 (testing), and 0.796 ± 0.024 (external validation). For post-LIFT, AUCs were 0.996 ± 0.003, 0.847 ± 0.055, and 0.858 ± 0.026, respectively. Both models significantly outperformed model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (all Conclusion: We developed and externally validated interpretable ML-based models (LIFT) for predicting EIAIs after LT. These models enable individualized risk stratification at both preoperative and postoperative stages and may support personalized infection surveillance and management strategies. Prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.