Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369827›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

DataAtlas: automatic generation of data dictionaries using large language models.

Raffaele Giancotti, Rajna Fani, Rafi Al Attrach, Pierangelo Veltri, Tom Pollard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raffaele GiancottiLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3906-9214
Rajna FaniLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Rafi Al AttrachLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Pierangelo VeltriDepartment of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics, and Systems Engineering, Università della Calabria, Arcavata di Rende (CS), 87036, Italy.
Tom PollardLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-7898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Reuse of shared datasets is often limited by incomplete or inconsistent documentation, hindering interpretation and secondary analysis. We developed DataAtlas, an open-source system for automated generation of data dictionaries from tabular datasets. Materials and Methods: DataAtlas combines deterministic structural profiling with large language model (LLM)-based semantic inference to generate human-readable descriptions of datasets, tables, and variables. The system integrates column metadata, statistical summaries, and representative sample values to produce concise, context-aware descriptions. We evaluated the approach on 3 heterogeneous clinical datasets using structural validation, blinded LLM-based comparison with official documentation, human expert review, and downstream task evaluation. Results: Generated descriptions were frequently preferred over official documentation, particularly when existing descriptions were incomplete or ambiguous. Human expert review showed strong agreement with high-performing models, with most descriptions rated as correct and low rates of hallucination. The system accurately reconstructed schema elements and flagged inconsistencies in existing documentation. In a text-to-SQL benchmark, augmenting database schemas with generated data dictionaries improved execution accuracy from 0.52 to 0.88. Discussion: Automated data dictionary generation improved both dataset interpretability and downstream analytical performances. Results highlight the importance of column-level metadata, particularly representative sample values, in grounding LLM-generated descriptions. Limitations include sensitivity to sample quality, potential domain-specific misinterpretation, and variability across model architectures, indicating that generated outputs should augment rather than replace expert curation. Conclusion: DataAtlas provides a practical approach for generating structured data dictionaries, enhancing the accessibility, reproducibility, and reuse of clinical data.

Indexed as

clinical datadata dictionarygenerative AIlarge language models

Identifiers

PMID42369827
PMCPMC13310032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.