ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Sex differences in atrial fibrillation treatment with catheter ablation in Southern Brazil: Real-world insights from a Latin American registry-SBR-AF.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex differences in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment remain unexplored in low- and middle-income settings. Women are less often referred for catheter ablation for AF, and whether procedural efficacy and safety differ by sex remains unclear in this population. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes among patients with AF who underwent first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation in the Southern Brazilian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (SBR-AF), a Latin American multicenter prospective registry with ≥12 months of follow-up. Methods: The primary end point was any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Safety outcomes included periprocedural complications through hospital discharge. Results: In our cohort of 1130 patients, 315 (27.9%) were women. Women were older, were more symptomatic, and had higher thromboembolic risk scores at the time of ablation. Paroxysmal AF was more common in women (82.2% vs 72.3%), whereas persistent AF predominated among men. Over a median follow-up of 1.4 years (interquartile range 1.0-3.6 years), atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurred in 23.5% of women and 19.5% of men (log-rank, Conclusion: In the largest, real-world, multicenter, prospective cohort of AF ablation in Latin America, women underwent ablation at older ages with greater symptom burden yet achieved efficacy and safety comparable to men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.