ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Zero-contrast cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients with renal impairment.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary sinus venography is commonly used during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to guide left ventricular (LV) lead placement; however, iodinated contrast poses a substantial risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Evidence supporting contrast-sparing CRT techniques remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and renal outcomes of a zero-contrast CRT implantation strategy in patients with CKD. Methods: Consecutive patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m Results: Overall, 113 patients were analyzed. Zero-contrast implantation was successful in 57.5% of cases. Renal function remained stable after zero-contrast implantation (change in eGFR +3.6 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: Zero-contrast CRT implantation is feasible, safe, and effective, with better renal preservation in patients with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.