ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
1- and 2-stage hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation using a biparietal irrigated radiofrequency clamp: A dual-center cohort analysis.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hybrid thoracoscopic ablation (HA), by using a biparietal irrigated radiofrequency (RF) device for epicardial ablation combined with endocardial techniques, has emerged as a promising treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, findings from the endocardial validation are lacking. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate findings of endocardial validation after epicardial isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) and the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) during HA, performed either as a 1- or 2-stage procedure using a biparietal irrigated RF clamp. Methods: In this multicenter study, 57 patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing persistent AF underwent 1-stage (n = 28) or 2-stage HA (n = 29). During the endocardial part, mapping was performed to assess entrance and exit blocks of the PVs and LAPW and thus evaluate lesion completeness. Periprocedural findings, complications, redo ablations, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Patients in the 1-stage group had a longer AF duration (117 vs 33 months; Conclusion: HA using an irrigated RF clamp achieved a high percentage of PV and LAPW isolation during the 1- and 2-stage procedures, confirmed by endocardial validation, with low complication rates and sustained lesion integrity during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.