ArticlePeerJ2026
Trait prioritization and genotype selection for heat stress tolerance in wheat
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Terminal heat stress is a major limitation to wheat productivity, especially during the reproductive stage. This paper examines the genetic variation and correlations of heat tolerance traits in wheat using structural equation modeling (SEM) as a novel approach to reveal causal relationships among key reproductive traits. Genetic diversity was evaluated in 200 spring wheat genotypes grown under optimal and heat-stressed environments across two consecutive growing seasons. The traits studied included pollen viability (PV), grain number per spike (GpS), spikelet fertility (SpF), fertile florets per spikelet (FFpSp), grain filling duration (GFD), and anther length (AL). Notably, GpS and AL showed high heritability and genetic advancement in both environments, indicating a strong genetic influence and good potential for selection. SEM analysis revealed that SpF was the major direct contributor to GpS under normal conditions, whereas PV was the primary contributor under heat stress-an association not previously well documented in the literature. These findings were supported by principal component analysis (PCA), which showed that the first and second principal components explained 53.1% and 56.3% of the total variance in the first and second years, respectively. Trait correlations differed between environments: under normal conditions, GFD and GpS were closely aligned, while under heat stress, PV, SpF, and FFpSp clustered together, indicating a coordinated physiological response to stress. The results emphasize PV as a critical trait for selecting heat-tolerant wheat lines. Furthermore, three genotypes-Chenab-70, Pak-81, and Frontana-showed consistent tolerance across environments, providing valuable genetic resources for breeding climate-resilient wheat. This study presents a comprehensive analytic model integrating SEM and PCA to improve the accuracy of selecting physiological traits in wheat breeding under terminal heat stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.