ArticlePeerJ2026
YawnStim: a standardized and diverse video stimulus set.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In humans, contagious yawning is often elicited experimentally using a video stimulus, and individual differences in this response may be indicative of variation in important aspects of social cognition. However, researchers often use different and highly variable stimulus sets, making comparisons between studies and across conditions difficult. The lack of participant diversity within existing stimulus sets also limits the generalizability of previous findings. Here, a free stimulus set called YawnStim is described. YawnStim includes a series of standardized experimental and control videos from a diverse sample of men and women from the following self-identified categories: Caucasian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian. Videos are compiled into four conditions, including both (1) uncovered and (2) covered yawns, as well as (3) mouth closed and (4) mouth gaping controls. This stimulus package was validated in a series of five within-subjects laboratory experiments. Collectively, results from the individual experiments and accompanying mini meta-analyses demonstrated that both the uncovered and covered yawning conditions produced amplified self-reported yawning responses. Potential follow-up research both in terms of validation and further applications of YawnStim are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.