ArticleMedical research archives2024
Assessing risk of COVID-19 reinfection and complications in adults treated with stimulant medications: A retrospective study using electronic health records.
Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advancement in vaccines and treatments for COVID-19 over time, many concerns remain about reinfection and waning immunity against COVID-19 and its variants, including among individuals treated with stimulants. The study aimed to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 reinfection and severe illness among adults prescribed stimulants compared to those not on stimulant therapy to elucidate the potential relationship of this therapy to the COVID-19 reinfection-related outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database consisting of over 2,563,130 adults (age ≥18 years) with COVID-19 infection from January 1, 2020 to April 30, 2022. COVID-19 reinfection was defined as a new COVID-19 illness documented ≥ 30 days after the initial infection. Logistic regression was applied to assess the odds ratios (ORs) of COVID-19 reinfection and severe illness course (presence of emergence department (ED), hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) care, mortality) within 30 days of reinfection, controlled for demographic and comorbid condition characteristics. Analysis revealed that adults who received at least three prescriptions for stimulants, compared to those without any stimulant prescriptions within six months prior to the initial COVID-19 illness, were more likely to be re-infected by COVID-19 (aOR=1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-1.41 ), but less likely to be treated in the ED (aOR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.72-0.82), hospital (aOR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82), ICU (aOR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.89), or die (aOR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.64) within 30 days of reinfection (all p-values < 0.01). The study offers additional insights into the potential risks and benefits of prescription stimulants to aid in clinical decision making for treating COVID-19 reinfection in adults on stimulant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.