ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Toward Successful International Pooling of Breast Implant Registry Data: The Role of Dataset Uniformity.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary on: Toward Successful International Pooling of Breast Implant Registry Data: The Role of Dataset Uniformity.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread clinical use, the long-term performance of breast implants remains debated. Current evidence is limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent methodologies. National breast device registries provide valuable real-world data, yet their impact is constrained by heterogeneity in variable definitions, data structures, and analytical approaches. The International Collaboration of Breast Registry Activities (ICOBRA) initiative established a harmonized dataset utilized by several countries. Objectives: Evaluate the implementation of the dataset of the ICOBRA across national registries, identify inconsistencies in data definitions and structures, and develop an updated international dataset supporting standardized, federated analyses. Methods: Datasets from 5 national breast implant registries utilizing the harmonized dataset were systematically reviewed. Variations in data points and definitions were identified and discussed through a series of in-person and online consensus meetings. Structured voting was used to finalize revisions and establish the updated international core dataset. Results: Key discrepancies were identified in the classification of surgical indications, inclusion of implant types, and variable definitions across registries. As a result, more than half of the original core variables required revision, reclassification, or removal to enable multinational analyses. A federated analysis model was proposed to accommodate privacy regulations and registry diversity while supporting standardized, risk-adjusted analyses. Conclusions: The updated international breast implant registry dataset represents a crucial step toward integrated global surveillance. Together with standardized statistical methods within a federated data model, it enables robust pooled analyses without requiring uniform registry structures. Countries are encouraged to adopt the revised dataset and contribute to a collaborative framework that enhances patient safety through structured, large-scale data collection and analysis. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic: For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.