ReviewOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2026
Osteoporosis and fragility fracture burden in Asia Pacific: Key findings from the APCO-IOF Asia Pacific Regional Audit.
Review in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid population aging in the Asia Pacific region will significantly increase its burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO)-International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Asia Pacific Regional Audit was developed through a coordinated effort of these two organizations. Spanning data from 22 countries and regions in the Asia Pacific, it comprehensively assembles the most current regionally relevant osteoporosis evidence available. The audit used a structured questionnaire covering 12 domains, supplemented by demographic projections, registry data, government statistics, and expert consensus estimates where formal data were unavailable. The audit revealed that osteoporosis is a national health priority in only six countries, limiting attention, funding, and coordinated service development. It also highlights glaring infrastructural gaps: insufficient fracture surveillance, uneven diagnostic access, misaligned reimbursement, and limited secondary fracture prevention. Collectively, these deficiencies point not to a lack of evidence, but to an implementation deficit in translating evidence into routine care. The audit proposes several key solutions including implementing fracture registries and post-fracture care pathways, developing coherent country-specific guidelines, aligning reimbursement with risk profile, and tracking quality outcomes. These findings provide a timely roadmap for governments and health care systems to reduce fracture burden and improve equitable osteoporosis care across the Asia Pacific region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.