ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Beyond the abdomen: an interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative ileus in non-abdominal surgery.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Postoperative ileus (POI) following non-abdominal surgery is an underestimated complication. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict POI risk, specifically integrating brain-gut axis variables, including depression history and chronic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients undergoing non-abdominal surgery. The cohort was divided into training (n=1050), internal testing (n=450), and external validation (n=500) cohorts. A dual-algorithm feature selection strategy combining LASSO and Boruta was used to identify robust predictors. Eight machine learning algorithms were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis. Results: Seven independent predictors were identified: chronic SSRI use, history of depression, intraoperative opioids, duration of surgery, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, serum albumin, and fluid balance. The Random Forest model demonstrated superior discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.942 in the training cohort, 0.917 in the internal testing cohort, and 0.895 in the external validation cohort. It significantly outperformed standard logistic regression (p<0.05) and displayed excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated a high net clinical benefit, while SHAP analysis visually confirmed the substantial contribution of brain-gut axis factors to delayed bowel recovery. Conclusion: The Random Forest model provides a robust and generalizable tool for predicting POI in non-abdominal surgery patients. By highlighting the critical influence of the brain-gut axis, this study offers new insights for risk stratification and personalized perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.