ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Lessons Learned from Providing Integrated Care Within an Interprofessional Learning and Innovation Network in the Community.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Interprofessional Learning and Innovation Network (IP-LIN), comprising nursing and social care professionals, students, and teachers, was established to enhance integrated care competences, specifically attention to health and wellbeing for older adults living in the community. Description: This case study with ten interprofessional case discussions and two focus groups was completed with nursing and social work professionals, students and teachers. Thematic analysis regarding five interprofessional competences of the Zuyd Interprofessional Building Blocks model was conducted. Key recurring themes included responsibility, available time, mutual understanding of professional language, reflection on attitudes, and optimising client autonomy. Identified barriers were the absence of a joint care plan, incomplete application of the methodical circle, and insufficient consultation among professionals involved with the client. Discussion: Participants recognised that interprofessional learning fosters improved collaboration between nursing and social work domains; however, the absence of a joint care plan remains a significant obstacle to fully integrated care. Conclusion: The IP-LIN facilitated opportunities for professionals, students, and teachers to understand each other's roles, responsibilities, and perspectives, thereby increasing confidence in interprofessional and team competencies. Successful IP-LIN implementation requires sustained commitment from both care and social work sectors to overcome existing barriers and promote integrated care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.