Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369577›Full record

ArticleProgress in artificial intelligence2026

Multinomial Classification Certainty: a new uncertainty metric for multinomial outcome prediction.

Florian van Daalen, Ralph Brecheisen, Leonard Wee, Andre Dekker, Inigo Bermejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian van DaalenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Ralph BrecheisenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Leonard WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Inigo BermejoDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certainty of classifications is crucial when it comes to the practical application of machine learning models. Model performance measures such as accuracy are focused on the average performance of a model. However, when a model is used in a practical setting, such as a medical clinic, it is more important to know how certain the model is of a given prediction or classification than its average performance. Unfortunately, often models only provide a final classification label, usually of the class with the highest probability. This output, however, is not sufficiently informative of the certainty of this particular classification, especially in the presence of multiple classes: the highest probability might be only barely higher than the second highest. Even when a probability distribution is provided, there is no established metric to determine if a particular classification is more certain than a different one. In this article we propose a novel metric we have termed Multinomial Classification Certainty, to represent the certainty of model predictions. We discuss why existing methods cannot represent this type of certainty and we show the mathematical meaning behind important thresholds for this new measure.

Indexed as

Border detectionImage segmentationPredictive certaintyUncertaintyUncertainty measure

Identifiers

PMID42369577
PMCPMC13308692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.