ArticleHardwareX2026
Design of an onboard computer for small experimental rockets with an integrated hardware-in-the-loop validation framework.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small sounding rockets provide an accessible, cost-effective platform for education and experimental research, especially at universities. In such projects, the onboard computer (OBC) is essential to mission reliability. It is responsible for sensor data acquisition, real-time flight-state detection, data logging, and actuation during recovery events. This work presents the design and implementation of a dedicated OBC for small experimental rockets, together with systematic validation using an integrated hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation framework. The proposed OBC integrates an ARM-based STM32F407 microcontroller, a multi-sensor measurement suite including inertial and barometric sensors, non-volatile data storage, dual pyrotechnic channels, a robust power-management subsystem, and a fully deterministic software architecture tailored for real-time flight-event detection. Complementing the flight hardware, the HIL environment reproduces the electrical, timing, and communication behavior of onboard sensors with high fidelity. Synthetic measurements derived from flight-dynamics simulations are injected through a dedicated interface, enabling end-to-end validation of data acquisition, state-transition logic, and onboard memory logging without requiring physical launches. Experimental HIL results demonstrate reliable detection of high-energy, low-energy, and apogee flight phases under realistic conditions, validating both the hardware design and algorithmic performance. The datasets and design files released with this work provide a reproducible foundation for educational and research activities in similar avionics projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.