Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369561›Full record

ReviewBMJ oncology2026

Screen-and-treat: a sustainable solution for cervical cancer elimination in low and middle income countries.

Laura Cardoso, Rakiya Saidu, Louise Kuhn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura CardosoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7492-323X
Rakiya SaiduDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4959-8157
Louise KuhnGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2305-8665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease, yet over 90% of its global mortality occurs in low and middle income countries(LMICs), reflecting profound inequities in access to screening and treatment. Traditional multivisit cervical cancer prevention models have been inadequate in these settings, largely due to high rates of loss to follow-up and insufficient health system infrastructure. In response, the WHO recommends the screen-and-treat (SAT) approach, which offers treatment based on a positive screening result, without requiring histological confirmation, preferably within a single visit. This narrative review synthesises evidence on the clinical effectiveness and operational feasibility of SAT in resource-constrained settings, with a focus on screening modalities, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and treatment options including cryotherapy, thermal ablation (TA) and large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). While VIA is low-cost and provides immediate results, its accuracy is limited by provider-dependent subjectivity. HPV testing, particularly through point-of-care platforms and self-sampling, offers higher sensitivity and improved acceptability and is now the WHO-recommended primary screening modality. For treatment, portable TA devices have emerged as a logistically superior alternative to cryotherapy in LMICs, eliminating the need for compressed gas while maintaining comparable efficacy. Recent evidence further confirms that TA is non-inferior to LLETZ in real-world SAT settings, challenging the long-held perception that ablative therapies are clinically inferior. Concerns about overtreatment persist but must be weighed against the considerably greater risk of undertreatment in fragmented health systems. Women living with HIV require particular attention, given higher HPV prevalence, lower test specificity, more rapid disease progression and substantially lower post-treatment cure rates, necessitating tailored management protocols. The SAT approach represents a pragmatic, evidence-based strategy for achieving cervical cancer elimination in LMICs, but its effectiveness will depend on contextually appropriate implementation, integration within existing primary healthcare services and dedicated strategies for high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Cancer screeningCervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID42369561
PMCPMC13295903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.