ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Linkages between soil-specific enzyme activity and microbial necromass carbon: implications for ecological restoration.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological restoration can effectively boost soil fertility and microbial activity in degraded ecosystems. Yet, its impact on the relationship between soil-specific enzyme activity (SSEA) and microbial necromass carbon in barren sandy soils is still poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the effects of ecological restoration on the SSEA per unit of soil organic carbon (SOCE) and SSEA per unit of microbial biomass carbon (MBCE), as well as their correlation with the necromass accumulation coefficient (AC). To this end, we collected and analyzed soil samples from the grazing land (control) and restored grassland, scrubland, and forestland in a typical degraded sandy land. Compared with grazing land, restored grassland and scrubland had lower SOCE levels of β-1, 4-glucosidase (BG), β-D-cellobiosidase (CBH), L-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), and acid phosphatase (AP), whereas restored forestland had a higher SOCE level of β-1, 4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG). Additionally, restoring to scrubland and forestland increased the MBCE of BG, CBH, NAG, LAP, and AP, while restoring to grassland, scrubland, and forestland increased the geometric mean of enzyme activity (GMEA) by 59.5, 46.8, and 108.2%, respectively, compared with grazing land. The SOCE of BG, LAP, and AP showed quadratic relationships with SOC, and the MBCE of BG, CBH, LAP, and AP was positively correlated with necromass AC. SOCE and MBCE were substantially affected by ecological restoration. Our results emphasize that SOCE can be used as an indicator of SOC, and MBCE can be used to predict changes in microbial necromass during vegetation restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.