Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369550›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Crop rotation patterns affect the growth, soil properties, and rhizosphere microbiome of cut chrysanthemums.

Chaoyue Tang, Huayang Li, Xiong Shi, Hong Ge, Yaping Kou, Shuhua Yang, Ruidong Jia, Xin Zhao

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chaoyue TangState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huayang LiState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiong ShiState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hong GeState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yaping KouState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuhua YangState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruidong JiaState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Flower Crops (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Continuous cropping obstacles in cut chrysanthemum, which are characterized by soil nutrient imbalance, reduced enzyme activities, and disrupted rhizosphere microbial communities, restrict the development of its industry. This study investigated the regulatory effects of crop rotation on soil properties and microbial communities, and compared the mitigation efficiency of different rotation patterns. Results: At 60 days of growth, cut chrysanthemums under crop rotation systems exhibited significant increases in stem diameter, as well as fresh and dry weights of both aboveground and underground biomass, compared to continuous cropping. Rotation significantly increased soil total nitrogen, hydrolyzable nitrogen, and available phosphorus, with cabbage rotation exhibiting the most prominent phosphorus accumulation effect. The activities of soil catalase, alkaline phosphatase, and sucrase were higher in rotation groups, whereas the activity of urease decreased with successive planting cycles. Bacterial richness increased with planting cycles, while fungal diversity declined. Notably, rotation reduced the relative abundance of pathogenic Conclusion: Crop rotation with maize or cabbage alleviates continuous cropping obstacles by improving soil nutrient status, enhancing enzyme activities, and optimizing rhizosphere microbial communities. Maize rotation excels in regulating soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities, whereas cabbage rotation is more effective in promoting plant biomass during the vegetative growth stage, accumulating soil phosphorus, and inhibiting pathogenic fungi. This study provides a theoretical basis for sustainable cut chrysanthemum production via rotation management strategies designed to enhance soil microbial and physicochemical properties.

Indexed as

chrysanthemumcontinuous cropping obstaclescrop rotationrhizosphere microorganismssoil properties

Identifiers

PMID42369550
PMCPMC13296538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.