Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369523›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Comparative Evaluation of Pretrained Large Language Models for Suicide Risk Prediction from Clinical Notes in U.S. Veterans.

Joshua Levy, Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Luke Rozema, Siamack Ayandeh, Alos Diallo, Yefan Zhou, Siting Li, Weiyi Wu, Brian Shiner and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joshua LevyDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-1291
Maxwell LevisWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Monica DimambroWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Luke RozemaWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Siamack AyandehUtah VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Alos DialloGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Yefan ZhouGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Siting LiGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Weiyi WuGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Brian ShinerWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Jiang GuiGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
CSRD VA IK2 CX002630NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide remains a significant and potentially preventable cause of death among United States veterans. Predictive models based on structured electronic health record (EHR) data, including the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH-VET) program, aim to identify individuals at elevated risk for enhanced monitoring and follow-up. Increasing evidence suggests that unstructured clinical narratives contain additional psychosocial information that may enhance risk prediction when analyzed using natural language processing (NLP). However, optimal approaches for representing clinical text remain uncertain. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable contextual text representations that capture complex semantic relationships beyond traditional lexical methods. Methods: We compared the predictive performance of pretrained LLMs with classical bag-of-words (BoW) representations for suicide risk prediction using clinical notes from 27,241 veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration. Patients were stratified by REACH-VET risk tier (low, moderate, high), and models were evaluated across prediction windows defined by note look-back periods (<30, <90, and <270 days). Results: LLM-based representations outperformed BoW approaches in seven of nine risk tier-time window combinations, achieving a maximum AUROC of 0.644 when solely considering text. Incorporating structured clinical variables further improved performance (AUROC=0.748). Model interpretation identified suicide-related language, especially in notes documented within 30 days of the outcome among patients classified as high risk. Conclusions: Pretrained LLMs can extract clinically meaningful information from narrative documentation, providing a foundation for future work adapting to additional clinical contexts and nuanced temporal associations to improve suicide risk prediction.

Identifiers

PMID42369523
PMCPMC13308335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.