Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369505›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Adherence to Red Reflex and Vision Screening Recommendations: A Deep Dive into Primary Care Implementation Gaps.

Afua O Asare, Giovani Robles, E Eugenie Hartmann, Carole Stipelman, Dallen Calder, Olaoluwa Omotowa, Jessie Montgomery, Bryce T Baugh, Brian Stagg, Guilherme Del Fiol and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Afua O AsareDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-0799
Giovani RoblesSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0009-0009-5050-0322
E Eugenie HartmannAkron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.ORCID 0009-0005-9574-4479
Carole StipelmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-9819-7109
Dallen CalderSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-5782
Olaoluwa OmotowaSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0001-7554-035X
Jessie MontgomerySpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-9723-3892
Bryce T BaughSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-9792
Brian StaggDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-4023-1885
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799
Melissa H WattDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-1317-3536
Michelle R HribarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-1858
J D SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-1748-6281

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Bryan William Jones · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Early childhood vision screening is critical for detecting amblyopia and other vision-threatening conditions. Despite screening recommendations during well-child visits, rates remain low. Red reflex assessment is recommended to identify serious ocular pathology, yet its use in primary care is not well described. We examined rates and drivers of vision screening in pediatric primary care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records for children 3-5 years attending well-child visits in 2022 in one of three representative primary care clinics within a university health system. Outcomes were documented red reflex and functional vision tests. We evaluated associations with patient demographics and clinic site using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 1,003 visits, 21.1% (n=212) had a documented red reflex assessment, and 60.8% (n=610) a functional vision test. Younger children (ages 3 and 4 vs. 5 years) had higher odds of red reflex assessment [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 9.00 and 8.64], and lower odds of a functional vision (aOR 0.47 and 0.59) test. Females had higher odds of red reflex assessment (aOR 1.53). Other/Multiracial children had lower odds of red reflex assessment than Non-Hispanic White children (aOR 0.48). Screening rates varied significantly by clinic site. Conclusions: Visual function and red reflex assessment are inconsistently performed in pediatric primary care, with particularly low rates of red reflex documentation. Screening rates varied between clinics and were affected by age. These findings highlight missed opportunities for early detection of vision-threatening conditions and identify targets for improving adherence to pediatric vision screening recommendations.

Indexed as

instrument-based screeningPediatricsphotoscreenersprimary careRed Reflexvision CareVision Screeningvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID42369505
PMCPMC13308291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.