ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Epileptogenicity alters intrahippocampal ripple propagation.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Tracing the propagation of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) aids in localizing epileptogenic regions and improving surgical outcomes. We examined how hippocampal epileptogenicity influences the propagation properties of the HFOs it generates. Methods: We analyzed non-REM sleep stereo-EEG from 49 patients (68 hemispheres) with verified hippocampal contacts. Hippocampi were stratified by excitability: 28 seizure onset zone (SOZ), 22 more-irritative non-SOZ (>6 interictal epileptiform discharges [IED]/min), and 18 less-irritative non-SOZ (<6 IED/min). To isolate significant HFO propagation pathways, we constructed empirical temporal networks (maximum latency 150 ms) and validated them against 1,000 permutation-generated surrogates. We then compared the proportion of statistically significant propagating HFOs originating from hippocampal contacts across these groups. Results: We examined ripples on oscillation (RonO, 80-250 Hz) and fast ripples on oscillation (FRonO, 250-600 Hz). FRonO, but not RonO, rates were significantly elevated in hippocampal SOZ versus non-SOZ contacts (p<1e-9). Intrahippocampal RonO propagation proportion was highest in less-irritative non-SOZ compared to more-irritative non-SOZ (p<0.05) and SOZ (p<0.001). Across groups, we found no other differences in RonO or FRonO propagation proportions, including spread to other mesial-temporal structures or the neocortex. Significance: Intrahippocampal RonO propagation is proportionally greater in less-irritative non-SOZ tissue than in the epileptogenic hippocampus. Distinguishing physiological from pathological RonO using signal features alone remains challenging. Our work suggests these categories are not distinct; rather, RonO signals and their underlying hippocampal substrates likely exist on a continuous physiological-to-pathological spectrum. Furthermore, RonO propagation may serve as a novel metric to quantify hippocampal epileptogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.