Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369441›Full record

ArticleNAM journal2025

Advancing quantitative hazard banding using expanded probabilistic reference doses and high-throughput screening data for preliminary hazard assessment.

Yu-Syuan Luo, Yu-Jia Yeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAM journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu-Syuan LuoInstitute of Food Safety and Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yu-Jia YehInstitute of Food Safety and Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data unavailability in health reference values poses a significant challenge in chemical risk assessment. Hazard banding (HB) offers a practical solution by categorizing chemicals into bands that represent increasing levels of health hazard. However, the strength and validity of these bands are often based on health-based guidance values from small sample sizes due to data scarcity. This study aims to develop quantitative hazard bandings using an expanded dataset of probabilistic reference dose values (pRfD) and endocrine-related quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) data. We hypothesize that quantitative hazard bandings can accurately reflect chemical hazards' nature and severity. pRfD values (

Indexed as

Endocrine-active potentialGlobally harmonized system (GHS)High-throughput screening dataProbabilistic reference doseQuantitative hazard bandingReproductive and developmental toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42369441
PMCPMC13289199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.