Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369432›Full record

ReviewNAM journal2025

Samuel Madureira Silva, Steven Van Cruchten, Freddy Van Goethem, Tamara Vanhaecke, Ellen Goossens, Yoni Baert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in NAM journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel Madureira Silva
Steven Van Cruchten
Freddy Van Goethem
Tamara Vanhaecke
Ellen Goossens
Yoni Baert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant push towards the development of animal-free methods in toxicology. Despite this progress, the adoption of such methods in safety assessment practices remains limited, particularly in the context of gonadal and placental toxicity. This paper reviews current

Indexed as

Animal-free testingDevelopmental and reproductive toxicology (DART)Endocrine disruptionGametogenesisGonadal toxicityHuman-relevant modelsIn vitro toxicologyMicrofluidic systemsNew approach methodologies (NAMs)OrganoidsOrgan-on-a-chipPlacental toxicityRegulatory toxicologySteroidogenesisSurvey study

Identifiers

PMID42369432
PMCPMC13289032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.