Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369387›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2026

Civility and Academic Advancement: Evaluating Its Roles in United States Medical School Appointment, Promotion, and Tenure Policies.

Divya Shankar, Maya S Iyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Divya ShankarDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Maya S IyerDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8213-5379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civility, encompassing respect and courtesy, is fundamental to healthy workplace environments but remains inconsistently addressed in academic medicine. This study investigates whether United States (U.S.) medical schools include civility as a criterion in Appointment, Promotion, and Tenure (APT) policies. From August to October 2024, we reviewed publicly accessible APT documents from 143 U.S. medical schools and identified 103 eligible schools. We conducted a keyword-based content analysis using 21 civility-related terms grounded in peer-reviewed literature. While 58.3% of documents referenced professionalism and 23.3% referenced respect or collegiality, only 4.9% mentioned terms like "civil," "bully," or "mistreat." Although 26.2% of APT documents referenced codes of conduct, none included accessible links or consequences for uncivil behavior. Our findings align with the American Association of University Professors' (AAUP) position that discourages civility as a promotion criterion. However, excluding civility from APT policies may allow incivility to persist unchecked, which can ultimately negatively impact patient care and the healthcare environment. These results suggest the need for standardized institutional processes to report and address incivility, supporting a safe academic environment.

Indexed as

academic advancementcivilitypolicypromotion

Identifiers

PMID42369387
PMCPMC13305514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.