ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Mixed methods analysis of the cultural acceptability and competence of SNAP in Rhode Island and Connecticut.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This mixed-method study examined Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants' perceptions of cultural acceptability and competence. Methods: In Summer 2023 and 2024, 678 and 462 SNAP participants, respectively, living in Rhode Island or Connecticut enrolled in the study. Participants completed an online questionnaire with closed and open-ended questions about perceived cultural barriers. We analyzed closed-ended questions quantitatively to assess the frequency of reported cultural barriers and used content analysis to analyze open-ended responses. Results: Most participants (95%) reported being able to buy foods that fit within their culture using SNAP benefits and most felt (89%) that their cultural backgrounds were respected when using and enrolling in SNAP. Participants identified grocery stores' wide availability of foods as a facilitator for cultural acceptability. Most participants felt their cultural background is respected when using SNAP. However, among participants reporting cultural barriers, such concerns were intertwined with other structural barriers like cost, lack of transportation, and stigma. Some participants reported that cultural factors were a nonissue as they identified as "lacking culture". Conclusion: This study offers an insightful glimpse into how the identities of SNAP participants impact their experience with the program and indicate that most participants perceive SNAP as culturally acceptable and competent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.