Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369379›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Mixed methods analysis of the cultural acceptability and competence of SNAP in Rhode Island and Connecticut.

Emily Elenio, Alexia Sanchez Contreras, Coco Huang, Elena Hurtado Solberg, Maya Vadiveloo, Alison Tovar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily ElenioDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, United States.
Alexia Sanchez ContrerasBrown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Coco HuangBrown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Elena Hurtado SolbergBrown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Maya VadivelooDepartment of Nutrition, University of Rhode Island, United States.
Alison TovarDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This mixed-method study examined Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants' perceptions of cultural acceptability and competence. Methods: In Summer 2023 and 2024, 678 and 462 SNAP participants, respectively, living in Rhode Island or Connecticut enrolled in the study. Participants completed an online questionnaire with closed and open-ended questions about perceived cultural barriers. We analyzed closed-ended questions quantitatively to assess the frequency of reported cultural barriers and used content analysis to analyze open-ended responses. Results: Most participants (95%) reported being able to buy foods that fit within their culture using SNAP benefits and most felt (89%) that their cultural backgrounds were respected when using and enrolling in SNAP. Participants identified grocery stores' wide availability of foods as a facilitator for cultural acceptability. Most participants felt their cultural background is respected when using SNAP. However, among participants reporting cultural barriers, such concerns were intertwined with other structural barriers like cost, lack of transportation, and stigma. Some participants reported that cultural factors were a nonissue as they identified as "lacking culture". Conclusion: This study offers an insightful glimpse into how the identities of SNAP participants impact their experience with the program and indicate that most participants perceive SNAP as culturally acceptable and competent.

Indexed as

Cultural acceptabilityCultural competenceMixed-methodsSupplemental nutrition assistance program

Identifiers

PMID42369379
PMCPMC13293736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.