ArticlePsychiatry research communications2026
A psychometric assessment of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for people living with acutely-treated HIV in Thailand.
Article in Psychiatry research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a commonly used depression inventory, but its psychometric properties have not been thoroughly examined in either people living with HIV (PLWH) or in developing nations. We examined the psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 in PLWH in Thailand. Methods: The RV254/SEARCH010 cohort enrolls adults with acute HIV in Bangkok, Thailand. Most study participants initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) at enrollment. We analyzed responses to the PHQ-9 at weeks 0 (enrollment), 4, and 24. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to compare a 1-factor model, three 2-factor models, and a bi-factor model. Longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) was assessed for the 1-factor, optimal 2-factor, and bi-factor models. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were calculated. Correlations between factors and item response theory (IRT) were used to further examine performance. Results: There were 734 (97.8 % male) participants with a median (Q1-Q3) age of 27 (23-32) years. CFA confirmed that the bi-factor model had the best fit. Regardless, LMI was confirmed for the 1-, 2-, and bi-factor models. The PHQ-9 was reliable (coefficient alpha = 0.86-0.89; test-retest reliability, Conclusions: These results support the use of the PHQ-9 in Thai PLWH. Despite the superior fit indices of the bi-factor model, the subfactors were strongly correlated with the general factor, so we recommend that the 1-factor model be used in practice. The evidence for LMI support use of the PHQ-9 in longitudinal research involving Thai PLWH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.