Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369294›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A pilot study on integrating mindfulness-informed professional development for EFL teachers.

Oya Pelin Bektaş, Merve Geçikli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oya Pelin BektaşYunus Emre Secondary School, Bayburt, Türkiye.
Merve GeçikliDepartment of English Language Teaching, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot mixed-methods case study investigates the mindfulness levels and perceptions of secondary school EFL teachers as the initial phase of a larger intervention project aimed at enhancing teacher wellbeing and professional competence. Acknowledging the emotional, cognitive, and relational demands of language teaching, this study assesses teachers' mindfulness skills and examines conditions that influence their openness to and engagement with mindfulness-based practices today. Thirty-one teachers completed two standardized instruments-the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS)-while eight teachers participated in semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings showed moderate overall mindfullness, with higher competence in observing and describing and lower performance in acting with awareness and accepting without judgment, while observing emerged as the strongest predictor of overall mindfulness. Qualitative results revealed limited prior knowledge of mindfulness, but generally positive attitudes toward its potential benefits for emotional regulation, stress reduction, and classroom climate. Teachers also identified several barriers to practical implementation, including time constraints, insufficient training, institutional pressures, and possible misconceptions among administrators or parents. Despite these concerns, participants expressed interest in professional development opportunities that provide clear conceptual grounding, practical strategies, and classroom-relevant applications. Taken together, these findings underscore the need for mindfulness-informed professional development that systematically builds mindfulness skills through scaffolded, context-sensitive approaches. The study provides a foundational evidence base for designing a targeted mindfulness-based intervention intended to strengthen EFL teachers' wellbeing, resilience, and pedagogical presence within demanding instructional environments.

Indexed as

EFL pedagogyEFL teachersemotional regulationmindfulnessmindfulness-informed professional developmentteacher mindfulnessteacher wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42369294
PMCPMC13293943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.