Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369292›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Trial history shapes the alerting-congruency interaction in selective attention.

Maya J Golden, Thomas G Hutcheon, Carlos Gomez-Rivas, Todd A Kahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maya J GoldenDepartment of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.
Thomas G HutcheonPsychology Program, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, United States.
Carlos Gomez-RivasDepartment of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.
Todd A KahanDepartment of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cues that alert a person to the presence of an upcoming stimulus increase phasic alertness and speed responses, but these cues can come at a cost where distractors have a greater influence on performance. The interaction between alerting and distractor congruency reveals how transient increases in alertness influence performance. This study investigated whether trial history influences this interaction. We tested whether the interaction between alerting and congruency was moderated by the congruency of the preceding trial or by response repetitions. Using a large online sample (

Indexed as

cognitive controlphasic alertnessselective attentionstimulus–response primingworking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID42369292
PMCPMC13293858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.