ArticleKidney medicine2026
Systematic Evaluation of Plasma and Urine Metabolites to Predict the Risk of Adverse Kidney-related Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: The GCKD Study∗.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Accurate risk prediction of adverse kidney-related outcomes in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is essential to guide personalized treatment. Plasma and urine metabolites may individually or jointly improve prediction beyond clinically established prognostic factors. Study Design: Prospective German CKD cohort study. Setting & Participants: 5,217 individuals with predominantly CKD stage G3 at baseline and 6.5-year follow-up data (IQR, 6.5-6.5). Exposures or Predictors: Baseline metabolite levels measured using untargeted mass spectrometry: plasma (N=5,144; 1,096 metabolites) and urine (N=5,088; 1,129 metabolites). Outcomes: (i) Kidney failure (KF): kidney replacement therapy or death by untreated KF; (ii) composite kidney endpoint (CKE): KF, ≥ 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, or eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m Analytical Approach: Time-to-event analysis using subdistribution hazard models with component-wise boosting for metabolite selection. The predictive performance of metabolite models was compared to benchmark models, including established prognostic factors. Results: Several individual metabolites improved KF risk prediction beyond established prognostic factors (age, sex, eGFR, and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio). For example, adding plasma pseudouridine increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for KF at year 6 by 0.012 (95% CI, 0.005-0.018).Multimetabolite models for KF (mean, 36 metabolites) showed good performance, declining for more distant time points: AUC values were ≥ 0.89 at year 2 and ≥ 0.85 at year 6. Some metabolites, such as plasma N2,N5-diacetylornithine and urine 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-GPC (16:0/18:1), were selected more often than others. Overall, multimetabolite models demonstrated modest, partially significant improvements over clinical models, and were comparable to other suggested prognostic models of KF. Results for the CKE were similar. Limitations: Single-point, semiquantitative metabolite measurements. Conclusions: While certain metabolites improved the prediction of adverse kidney-related outcomes, added value was limited. However, prognostic metabolites may reflect relevant CKD-related metabolic pathways. Further research is warranted to refine prognostic models and explore the biological relevance of identified metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.