ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Assessing the diagnostic utility of baseline creatine kinase levels in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and neuromuscular disorders.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Serum creatine kinase (CK) is widely used in the diagnostic evaluation of neuromuscular disorders, including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). As most laboratories define reference ranges using the central 95% of values from white populations, elevated CK levels are common in otherwise healthy individuals. We investigated the predictive value of baseline CK at defined cutoffs for diagnosing an underlying myopathic illness including IIM. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive adult patients attending a tertiary neuromuscular clinic from January 2018 to June 2022. We investigated the test characteristics of CK based on several a priori defined thresholds. Results: From a total of 488 patients, we identified 276 IIM cases, 89 with a non-inflammatory myopathy and 123 had an alternative/reassuring aetiology. Baseline CK levels were significantly higher in the IIM and non-inflammatory myopathy groups vs the alternative/reassuring group. The laboratory defined cutoffs for CK yielded a sensitivity of 77.0%, a specificity of 66.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.3% for identifying IIM or other neuromuscular disorders, which only marginally improved when evaluating the 97.5th percentile (75.6, 67.5 and 87.3%) or the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) thresholds (68.8, 78.0 and 90.3%). Conclusion: The current thresholds defined by the EFNS guidelines compared with laboratory defined cutoff to pursue investigations for elevated CK only marginally improve specificity. A baseline CK >1000 IU/l is highly predictive of an IIM or other neuromuscular disorders. This study highlights the role of baseline CK levels in suspected IIM and neuromuscular disorders, clarifying its diagnostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.