ReviewPalliative care and social practice2026
Talking about the hypothetical future: Serious illness communication for residents living with dementia in long-term care homes - An integrative review.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In long-term care (LTC) homes, residents living with dementia frequently experience serious illness communication that is crisis-initiated and oriented to institutional documentation (e.g., transfer and resuscitation orders), rather than iterative, values-based discussions aligned with a palliative approach and substitute decision-making frameworks. Unpaid care partners often make high-stakes decisions with limited preparation, and residents are inconsistently included. Objectives: To explore how serious illness communication occurs with residents living with dementia, unpaid care partners, and healthcare providers in LTC, and to identify practice-relevant communication strategies and contextual factors applicable to clinical practice. Methods: An integrative review following Toronto and Remington's six-stage methodology included 31 high-relevance studies (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, reviews, theoretical) published from 2015 to 2025 on serious illness, goals-of-care, or end-of-life communication in LTC dementia care. Directed content analysis was guided by Tarbi et al.'s basic science of communication in serious illness (lexical, non-lexical, contextual elements, and outcomes). Results: Serious illness communication was predominantly biomedical and documentation-focused, often occurring at admission or during crises and directed mainly to unpaid care partners, with limited resident involvement. Lexical practices such as clear, jargon-free information, explicit invitations to discuss "what matters most," and early conversations about hypothetical future scenarios enhanced trust, preparedness, and alignment of care with resident values. Non-lexical elements (tone, eye contact, pacing, use of silence) shaped perceived empathy but were seldom explicitly addressed by interventions. Conclusions: For LTC healthcare providers, embedding earlier, iterative serious illness communication, explicitly involving residents where possible, and cultivating both lexical and non-lexical skills are key to achieving relationship-centred, legally compliant, and goal-concordant palliative approaches to care..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.