Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369177›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Effect of needle disinfection with different antiseptic agents on infectious complications after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized study.

Mustafa Serdar Çağlayan, Mustafa Kestel, Musa Ekici, Cemil Aydin, Muhammet İhsan Öztürk, Ahmet Taşcı, Mehmet Murat Baykam

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06836271 (The Effect of Cleaning the Biopsy Needle With Isopropyl Alcohol, Povidone Iodine and Formalin Before Transrectal Ultrasonography-guided Prostate Biopsy on Procedure-related Infective Complications), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06836271 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this map

The Effect of Cleaning the Biopsy Needle With Isopropyl Alcohol, Povidone Iodine and Formalin Before Transrectal Ultrasonography-guided Prostate Biopsy on Procedure-related Infective Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorHitit UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsProstatic CancerArmsIsopropyl Alcohol, Povidine-iodine, formaldehit, Standard BP control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa Serdar ÇağlayanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum 19030, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-8671
Mustafa KestelErol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-1655
Musa EkiciDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-4126
Cemil AydinDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-5748
Muhammet İhsan ÖztürkDepartment of Urology, Alaca State Hospital, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0687-5954
Ahmet TaşcıDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4718-6397
Mehmet Murat BaykamDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-4275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-guided biopsy) remains widely used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but it is associated with a risk of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of disinfecting the prostate biopsy needle with different antiseptic agents after each core sampling on post-procedural infectious complications. Design: A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical study. Methods: Between February and May 2025, 240 patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomly assigned to four groups ( Results: The rate of febrile urinary tract infection was highest in the non-disinfection group (11.6%). No cases of fever, hospitalization, or sepsis were observed in the formalin group. Povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol disinfection were associated with lower infection rates than no disinfection, but were less effective than formalin. Conclusion: Disinfection of the biopsy needle after each core sampling is associated with a meaningful reduction in infectious complications following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Among the evaluated agents, 10% formalin demonstrated the greatest protective effect; however, further multicenter studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm long-term safety and generalizability. Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06836271; Local trial ID: HititUrology001).

Indexed as

antiseptic disinfectionformalininfectious complicationsisopropyl alcoholpovidone-iodineprostate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42369177
PMCPMC13305399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.