ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The impact of acupuncturists' experience level on the efficacy of acupuncture for functional dyspepsia: an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acupuncture has shown significant therapeutic effects for functional dyspepsia (FD) in clinical trials. However, clinical observations reveal substantial variations in patient responses to acupuncture. In addition to patient-related factors, such variability may also be associated with differences in acupuncturists' clinical experience. This study compared the treatment outcomes for FD between junior and senior acupuncturists. Materials and methods: This exploratory secondary analysis used data from a previous randomized controlled trial. Patients were divided into two groups based on acupuncturists' years of practice as defined by the professional title evaluation rules, using 5 years as the cut-off (Group A treated by junior acupuncturists and Group B treated by senior acupuncturists). Outcome measures included the Symptom Index for Dyspepsia (SID), the four cardinal symptoms of FD, and the Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index (NDLQI). Assessments were conducted at baseline, treatment weeks 2 and 4, and follow-up weeks 4 and 12. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Results: Adjusted analyses were performed after including items with between-group differences as covariates. The study revealed that Group B had lower SID scores than Group A at both follow-up time points-at 4 weeks (mean difference: 0.6, Conclusion: Based on the 5-year administrative cutoff criterion, this exploratory secondary analysis found a potential association between acupuncturists' years of practice and acupuncture efficacy for FD, but prospective studies are needed for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.