ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Generative artificial intelligence in public health: a framework for governance and systemic integration.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond chatbots: generative AI as public health infrastructure and a new Digital Social Determinant of Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is poised to transform public health systems through its capacity for data synthesis and predictive modeling. This systematic review, analyzing 119 key studies, adopts a co-evolutionary lens to examine the dynamic interplay between GenAI advancements and public health system adaptation. We demonstrate that the effective integration of GenAI is fundamentally constrained by a system's infrastructural, institutional, and human resource maturity. Our analysis, grounded in the theory of Responsible Innovation, identifies three interconnected governance domains-technical transparency, institutional accountability, and ethical equity-that frame the core challenges. We subsequently propose a three-layer governance framework to navigate these issues, emphasizing that trustworthy AI ecosystems require more than technical excellence; they demand institutional foresight, inclusive governance, and a steadfast commitment to equitable, human-centered health futures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.