ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Dynamic prognostic prediction in sepsis using longitudinal blood gas trajectories: development and external validation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and externally validate a dynamic prognostic framework for sepsis based on longitudinal arterial blood gas trajectories, and to assess whether ABG-derived dynamic features provide incremental prognostic information beyond conventional clinical variables. Methods: This retrospective observational study used MIMIC-IV for model development and internal validation, and eICU-CRD for independent external validation. Adult ICU patients with sepsis and sufficient repeated ABG measurements within 168 h were included. Eight ABG-related variables were analyzed: PaO Results: After applying the longitudinal ABG completeness criteria, 1,378 patients from MIMIC-IV and 647 from the eICU-CRD external validation cohort were included. Clinically interpretable trajectories were identified for all eight ABG variables, suggesting dynamic physiological heterogeneity in sepsis. For post-landmark in-hospital mortality prediction, models integrating clinical variables, ABG trajectory posterior probabilities, and ABG summary statistics showed moderate discrimination. In MIMIC-IV internal validation, ROC-AUCs using data accrued up to days 3, 5, and 7 were 0.792, 0.796, and 0.808, respectively; the corresponding values in eICU-CRD external validation were 0.658, 0.679, and 0.703. Compared with the clinical reference model, adding ABG-derived dynamic features yielded small-to-moderate improvements in external validation, with ROC-AUC increases of 0.036, 0.044, and 0.055 across the three landmarks. However, gains were smaller in internal validation and not uniformly robust across settings. Incident septic shock analyses were limited by few post-landmark events, particularly in eICU-CRD, and were considered exploratory. Conclusion: Early longitudinal ABG trajectories in sepsis may capture dynamic physiological heterogeneity and provide limited complementary information beyond conventional clinical variables. Given the modest incremental benefit and inconsistent performance across cohorts, ABG-derived dynamic features should be regarded as adjunctive to clinical severity scores and clinical judgment. Their clinical utility requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.