ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The diaphragm-intercostal index for predicting weaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately predicting the risk of weaning failure is crucial for optimizing clinical decision-making and improving patient prognosis. Despite widespread use, the predictive value of diaphragm ultrasound remains controversial, and the compensatory role of auxiliary respiratory muscles has been overlooked. This study aims to evaluate whether the diaphragm-intercostal index (DII), a novel ultrasound index for joint assessment of diaphragm and intercostal muscle function, can predict weaning failure more accurately than traditional parameters. Methods: This prospective single-center cohort study enrolled invasive mechanical ventilation patients (≥48 h) ready for weaning. Ultrasound was performed 30 min into the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (pre-extubation, for primary predictive analysis) and 24 h post-extubation (for exploratory descriptive analysis only). Measurements included diaphragmatic excursion (DE), diaphragm thickening fraction (TFdi), and intercostal muscle thickening fraction (TFic). DII was calculated as TFic/TFdi. The primary outcome was weaning failure, defined as SBT failure or need for therapeutic non-invasive ventilation (NIV), reintubation, or death within 48 h post-extubation. Sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding SBT failure patients to assess DII's performance in predicting true post-extubation failure. Lasso-logistic regression and ROC curves assessed predictive performance. Results: Of 107 patients, 81 weaned successfully and 26 failed. Among failures, 5 (19.23%) had SBT failure, 8 (30.77%) required reintubation, 11 (42.31%) required therapeutic NIV, and 2 (7.69%) died. DII's AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.907-0.998), significantly outperforming RSBI (AUC = 0.789) and TFdi (AUC = 0.830). The optimal DII cutoff was >0.485 (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 97.5%). In the sensitivity analysis excluding SBT failures, DII's AUC for predicting true post-extubation failure remained high at 0.942 (95% CI: 0.887-0.996), and DeLong test showed no significant difference from the primary analysis ( Conclusion: DII can effectively quantify the compensation of the auxiliary respiratory muscles relative to the diaphragm, showing favorable predictive performance for predicting weaning failure, strikingly superior to traditional parameters. However, validation in large-scale, multi-center studies is needed, particularly after standardizing SBT protocols with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) as per guidelines, and in populations including obese and heart failure patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.