Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Home-based biofeedback with local anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence in women without sphincter structural defects.

Peter Liptak, Adam Lukac, Jan Mikler, Peter Banovcin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter LiptakClinic of Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Adam LukacClinic of Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Jan MiklerJessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Peter BanovcinClinic of Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent and distressing condition with restricted access to specialized biofeedback therapy. Home-based biofeedback devices constitute a potential solution to enhance treatment accessibility; however, evidence from sham-controlled trials assessing their physiological effects remains scarce. Methods: We conducted a single-center exploratory pilot study with a sham control involving women diagnosed with fecal incontinence. Baseline and post-treatment assessments included anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and evaluations of clinical symptoms. Subjects were allocated to either the intervention or sham therapy group and performed home training sessions six times per week over a period of 12 weeks. Adherence to the training regimen was monitored via a mobile application. Results: A total of 67 patients were screened, and 14 were assigned to intervention ( Conclusion: Home-based electrical biofeedback therapy was associated with positive trends in both anorectal physiological parameters and clinical symptom scores in women with fecal incontinence. These preliminary findings provide a basis for further investigation into home-based rehabilitation support strategies within controlled pelvic floor rehabilitation programs through larger randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

biofeedbackelectrical stimulationfecal incontinencetherapywomen

Identifiers

PMID42369129
PMCPMC13303362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.