Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369125›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

Comparative efficacy of different types of structured exercise interventions for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wuzhen Wang, Yingying Gu, Lisha Mo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wuzhen WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yingying GuSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Lisha MoThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Exercise interventions have demonstrated favorable effects for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but the optimal exercise regimen remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis. Objective: Investigate the effects of different types of structured exercise interventions on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and evaluate the quality of evidence for study outcomes using the GRADE system. Method: Search databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on exercise interventions for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis published from the inception of each database through December 2025. Analyses were performed using RevMan5.4.1and R4.4.2 software. Results: A total of 11 studies involving 503 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that exercise interventions significantly improved the 6-min walk distance (MD = 38.62 m, 95% CI: [25.72, 51.51], Conclusion: Structured exercise interventions, including mind-body integrated training, can improve exercise endurance, selected pulmonary function measures, quality of life, and dyspnea symptoms in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but No firm conclusion on overall safety could be drawn. However, the evidence strength for most outcomes remains limited due to the risk of bias and heterogeneity in existing studies. Future high-quality research is needed to further validate the long-term benefits of different exercise modalities. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251253143, CRD420251253143.

Indexed as

exerciseidiopathic pulmonary fibrosismeta-analysismind-body integration trainingstructured multi-component trainingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42369125
PMCPMC13303502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.