ReviewiScience2026
A review of scenario analysis tools for urban green space planning and management.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scenario analysis can help urban green space planning respond to uncertain environmental, social, and policy futures. This systematic review analyzed 157 publications to clarify its applications in green space planning and management. We distinguished two research traditions-studies identifying urban green spaces from land use and land cover data for regional ecological planning (UGS1), and studies examining green infrastructure within built urban environments (UGS2). Using a three-stage framework of scenario analysis, we found clear differences in the geographic distribution, focal issues, scenario construction approaches, and evaluation pathways. UGS1 mainly addressed ecological security and climate-related issues, whereas UGS2 emphasized climate regulation, stormwater management, and urban environmental quality. Overall, systematic evaluation frameworks and stakeholder engagement remained limited. This review identifies five opportunities to make scenario-based green space planning more actionable and decision relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.