Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369011›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026

PROTOCOL: Utilisation of Genetics and Genomics in Primary Care: Protocol for an Evidence and Gap Map.

Braulio Mark Valencia, Jialing Lin, Rafal Chomik, Chris Dietz, Shona Bates, Peter Brown, Limin Mao, Patricia Mary Davidson, Marc R Wilkins, Alexandra Martiniuk and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Braulio Mark ValenciaInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jialing LinInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rafal ChomikInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chris DietzInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shona BatesInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter BrownInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Limin MaoInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Patricia Mary DavidsonInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marc R WilkinsFaculty of Science, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alexandra MartiniukInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael KiddInternational Centre for Future Health Systems (ICFHS), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vikash Ranjan KeshriJindal School of Public Health & Human Development, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This protocol describes a Campbell evidence and gap map designed to visually map existing evidence on the application of genetic and genomic testing in primary care. Beyond outlining the rationale and motivation, this protocol details the methodological steps and rigorous criteria that will guide its development. These include: 1) conducting a systematic search to identify published literature on the use of genetic and genomic testing in primary care; 2) summarising and visually mapping the available evidence; and 3) identifying gaps in the current evidence base to inform future research priorities and policy directions. The resulting map is expected to provide a rigorous yet accessible tool for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to assess the current evidence landscape and identify opportunities to integrate genetics and genomics into routine healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

family practicegeneral practitionersgenetic testinggenomicsnext-generation sequencingpolygenic risk scoreprecision medicineprimary careprimary health carerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42369011
PMCPMC13305726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.