ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Deep learning prediction of chemo-immunotherapy response using tumor perfusion ultrasound images.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor heterogeneity poses a significant challenge for predicting responses to cancer therapy, highlighting the need for the development of biomarkers to guide personalized treatment. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging is an established method to assess tumor perfusion, which directly affects drug delivery and therapeutic efficacy, as poorly perfused tumors often limit the penetration of chemo- and immunotherapeutics. Methods: We developed a deep learning framework using CEUS imaging to predict the response of tumors to chemo-immunotherapy in murine models of breast cancer, fibrosarcoma, and melanoma. A convolutional neural network (CEUS-CNN) was trained on a dataset of 587 pre-treatment CEUS images to classify tumors as responsive, stable, or non-responsive based on RECIST version 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria (175 responsive cases, 136 stable, and 276 non-responsive). Additionally, synthetic data were created for the responsive and stable classes to address class disparity. Results: Our framework attained an overall test accuracy of 0.877 (0.941 for responsive, 0.615 for stable, 0.963 for non-responsive) using only real data. The addition of synthetic data led to improved model performance, with a notable impact on the previously underperforming stable class. Our strategy enhanced the predictive capability of our model, raising the average test accuracy to 0.930 (1.000 for responsive, 0.769 for stable, 0.963 for non-responsive). Conclusion: These findings support CEUS imaging as a possible imaging biomarker of response to cancer therapy and further indicate that the incorporation of synthetic data can enhance model effectiveness, particularly for underrepresented classes. Together, they highlight the potential value of integrating AI with CEUS for personalized cancer treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.