Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369006›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Federated learning framework for medical image analysis with perspective-aware contrastive and mixture of experts.

Shradhanjali Das, K Hemalatha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shradhanjali DasSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
K HemalathaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image analysis faces persistent challenges due to the distributed data, limited annotations, and variations in imaging modalities, acquisition protocols, and patient demographics. Centralized deep learning approaches compromise data privacy, while Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized model training without sharing raw data. However, conventional FL frameworks struggle with non-IID distributions and heterogeneous clinical environments, limiting their generalization and stability. We propose FedPAC-ME, a novel Federated Learning Framework for Medical Image Analysis that integrates Perspective-Aware Contrastive Learning with a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture to address heterogeneity and data imbalance. The framework introduces Multi-Perspective Augmentation (MPA) to emulate diverse clinical views, and a Perspective-Aware contrastive Module (PACM) that aligns representations across modalities and clients. Additionally, a Mixture of Experts routing layer dynamically allocates specialized experts to client-specific data distributions, enhancing adaptability and collaboration across sites. A Perspective-Aware Contrastive Loss (PACL) further enforces cross-view consistency during local training while maintaining global coherence across institutions. Extensive experiments on the BraTS2020 multi-institutional brain tumor segmentation dataset demonstrate that FedPAC-ME achieves 98.80% accuracy, surpassing state-of-the-art FL baselines by over 2.5%. These results confirm the framework's effectiveness in improving feature alignment, generalization, and privacy preservation under diverse clinical conditions.

Indexed as

attention contrastive modelattention mechanismfederated learningmedical image classificationmixture of expertsmulti perspective augmentationperspective aware contrastive

Identifiers

PMID42369006
PMCPMC13294053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.