Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368940›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Preparedness of the Ghana Health Service for field epidemiology and applied biostatistics: a systematic review protocol of infectious disease surveillance, outbreak investigation methodologies, and statistical modeling capacities in resource-limited settings.

Victor Luckyboy Dzramado, William Wilberforce Amoah, Samuel Antwi, Joana Edem Koto, Doris Hagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor Luckyboy DzramadoCape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.
William Wilberforce AmoahDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Samuel AntwiDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Joana Edem KotoKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Doris HaganDepartment of Public Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infectious disease outbreaks pose significant threats to global health security, with resource-limited settings in West Africa bearing a disproportionate burden. Despite sustained investments in field epidemiology training and surveillance system strengthening, no comprehensive systematic synthesis exists of Ghana Health Service preparedness for field epidemiology and applied biostatistics. This protocol addresses the primary research question: What is the current level of preparedness of the Ghana Health Service for field epidemiology and applied biostatistics, as assessed across World Health Organization International Health Regulations core capacity domains? Preparedness is operationally defined as the measurable capacity of the Ghana Health Service to detect, investigate, confirm, and respond to infectious disease events across the eight WHO IHR core capacity domains, including surveillance, human resources, laboratory systems, and response mechanisms. Methods and analysis: This systematic review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261299788). Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, African Index Medicus, African Journals Online, and grey literature sources for studies published from January 2010 to present. Eligible studies include those describing field epidemiology capacity, surveillance system performance, outbreak investigation preparedness, biostatistical capacity, training program outcomes, infrastructure, or health workforce within the Ghana Health Service. Two independent reviewers will screen citations, extract data, and assess quality using study-design-appropriate tools including the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist, CASP Qualitative Checklist, and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Primary outcomes are overall field epidemiology preparedness level measured using Joint External Evaluation and State Party Annual Reporting scores, and surveillance system performance with outbreak response capacity. Secondary outcomes include field epidemiology workforce capacity, statistical modeling and biostatistical capacity, and infrastructure and governance systems. Narrative synthesis is the primary analytic approach. Meta-analysis will be conducted where sufficient comparable studies with acceptable methodological homogeneity are identified. Discussion: This review will provide the first comprehensive assessment of Ghana Health Service field epidemiology preparedness mapped against WHO IHR core capacities, generating actionable evidence-based recommendations applicable to similar resource-limited settings across Africa. Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is required. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations, and policy briefs for the Ghana Health Service, Ministry of Health, and international stakeholders. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261299788, identifier CRD420261299788.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsDisease OutbreaksEpidemiologyModels, StatisticalPopulation SurveillanceGhanaHumansPublic Health InfrastructureResource-Limited SettingsSystematic Reviews as Topicbiostatisticsdisease surveillanceepidemic preparednessfield epidemiologyGhana Health Servicehealth systems strengtheningoutbreak investigationpublic health capacity

Identifiers

PMID42368940
PMCPMC13303809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.