Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Financial accessibility of school meals: evidence from parental willingness to co-pay in the UK.

Bisola Osifowora, Owen Nicholas, Raymond Oppong, Viktorija Kesaite, Amy Yau, Irina Pokhilenko, Martin White, Emma Frew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bisola OsifoworaHealth Economics Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Owen NicholasDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raymond OppongHealth Economics Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Viktorija KesaiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Amy YauPopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Irina PokhilenkoHealth Economics Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Emma FrewHealth Economics Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: School meals are an established population-level intervention to improve dietary intake and reduce health inequalities, yet expanding access is constrained by affordability barriers. This study aims to assess parental willingness to contribute to a subsidised co-payment model for primary school meals and to identify the socioeconomic, behavioral, and food insecurity-related factors influencing participation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1,009 UK parents was conducted using a contingent valuation approach. Parents were asked about their willingness to contribute toward both a standard and nutritionally enhanced school meal. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine associations between willingness to pay (WTP) and socioeconomic, behavioral, and food insecurity-related factors. Results: Eighty-eight percent of parents indicated a willingness to contribute to a subsidised school meal scheme. Among those willing to contribute, the mean willingness to pay was £2.45 per meal, with higher contributions observed for nutritionally enhanced meal options. Participation decreased as costs increased, indicating affordability as a key determinant of uptake. Socioeconomic factors, food insecurity, and prior engagement with school-based food provision were significantly associated with both willingness to pay and contribution levels. There was also evidence that parents were willing to contribute more toward nutritionally enhanced meal options. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of affordability and equity in the design of co-payment models for school meals. The results provide policy-relevant evidence to inform the development of financially sustainable and inclusive school meal programmes, including consideration of how nutritional quality influences parental engagement and perceived value.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalFood ServicesParentsSchoolsAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood InsecurityFood SupplyHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomchild nutritioncontingent valuationco-paymentfood insecurityhealth inequalitiespublic health policyschool mealswillingness to co-pay

Identifiers

PMID42368924
PMCPMC13294095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.