Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368912›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Explainable deep learning for healthcare workforce attrition: a methodological study on the Watson healthcare synthetic benchmark.

Dan Yin, Xinyu Lu, Tingyi Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan YinZhongshan Second People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Xinyu LuZhongshan Second People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Tingyi MeiZhongshan Second People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retaining qualified nurses and allied-health staff has become a central occupational-health concern for modern hospital systems, yet existing attrition-prediction models face a persistent trade-off between predictive accuracy and auditability. The quantitative contribution of modifiable occupational factors-working hours, work environment, compensation, and commuting burden-to individual departure decisions remains insufficiently characterized. Methods: We developed an end-to-end interpretable deep-learning framework and evaluated it on the publicly available Results: The proposed network achieved an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.934 ± 0.026 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.761 ± 0.091, matching or exceeding all three baselines while preserving minority-class sensitivity. Dual-level SHAP analysis consistently identified overtime status, environment satisfaction, marital status, job involvement, tenure in current role, age, and commuting distance as the dominant drivers of the predicted attrition label on this benchmark. It revealed interpretable non-linear thresholds together with auditable, case-by-case rationales. Conclusion: On this synthetic benchmark, a compact interpretable deep network matches strong tabular baselines while providing axiomatic, dual-level SHAP explanations that translate into three candidate retention levers-overtime reduction, working-environment improvement, and commuting support. Because the records are synthetic, these levers should be regarded as data-driven hypotheses rather than validated interventions, and prospective evaluation on real, de-identified hospital workforce data remains a necessary next step.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDeep LearningPersonnel TurnoverData AnalyticsHumansJob SatisfactionPredictive Learning ModelsWorking Conditionsdeep neural networkexplainable artificial intelligencehealthcare employee retentionjob satisfactionworkforce attrition prediction

Identifiers

PMID42368912
PMCPMC13303797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.