Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368875›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Response of leopard geckos (

Petra Frýdlová, David Hirschler, Aleksandra Chomik, Eliška Pšeničková, Eva Landová, Daniel Frynta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Response of leopard geckos (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petra FrýdlováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-9743
David HirschlerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.
Aleksandra ChomikDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1695-3006
Eliška PšeničkováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.
Eva LandováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-8710
Daniel FryntaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-7972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predator detection is a fundamental survival mechanism that has shaped the evolution of diverse antipredator strategies across animal taxa. The capacity to detect predators depends on the sensory modalities animals rely upon, and the integration of multiple sensory channels-multimodal perception-may enhance detection efficiency and improve survival. However, the functional significance and relative importance of multimodal perception in reptiles remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we experimentally disentangled the effects of individual sensory modalities-chemical, visual, and mechanosensory-by testing them independently and in combination, thereby assessing their relative and synergistic contributions to antipredator behavior in leopard geckos. Our results show that chemosensory information acts as the primary driver for both sensory assessment and active defense. While visual and mechanosensory stimuli did not independently increase tongue-flicking frequency compared with the control, they functioned as modulatory cues that significantly amplified chemical sampling in a multimodal context. However, overt antipredator behaviors, such as defensive posturing and mouth-open displays, were triggered exclusively by chemosensory stimuli, highlighting the dominant role of chemical cues in predator detection. Our statistical modeling suggests that sensory integration predominantly follows an additive pattern, where secondary modalities heighten alertness and facilitate threat assessment, but the initiation of costly defensive action remains strictly gated by chemoreception. These findings underscore the dominance of chemical cues for predator recognition in nocturnal environments, where multimodal inputs amplify attention but are not essential for eliciting a full defensive response.

Indexed as

Gekkotakairomonespredator-prey interactionsrisk assessmentsensory ecologysnakevomerolfaction

Identifiers

PMID42368875
PMCPMC13294456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.