ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A systematic review of existing brief interventions for youth following suicide attempt: informing the development of an autism-adapted intervention.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autistic youth are at elevated suicide risk, yet they face multiple barriers to mental health care, including a lack of interventions adapted to their unique needs and lived experiences. In the general population, brief interventions have been shown to reduce suicide risk during the high-risk period immediately following discharge from acute care for a suicide attempt. However, no suicide prevention intervention has been designed specifically for Autistic youth during this critical post-discharge period. The overarching aim of the current systematic review was to lay the groundwork for the development of a brief suicide intervention for Autistic youth following discharge from acute care. This review aimed to: (1) identify existing brief post-discharge interventions for general population youth (15-24 years) who have made a suicide attempt; (2) describe core strategies used; and (3) summarize evidence of intervention effectiveness. Methods: Following PRISMA reporting guidelines, five bibliographic databases were searched. Articles were included based on a rigorous selection process, and their quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Twenty-four studies were included in the review, representing sixteen interventions. No studies reported including Autistic individuals, and Autistic people were explicitly excluded from two studies. Articles presented mixed findings, with eight studies indicating that the brief intervention was associated with a reduction in suicide outcomes. Common strategies included follow-up contact, safety planning, and teaching coping skills. Discussion: Several brief suicide interventions and strategies show promise for non-Autistic youth post-discharge, their relevance for Autistic youth remains unclear, underscoring the need for autism-adapted approaches informed by Autistic youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.