ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Comparative analysis of diagnostic expectations between adults referred for ADHD and autism assessment: a thematic analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent trends in neurodevelopmental services promote joint assessment pathways combining ADHD and Autism services. However, no study has systematically compared diagnostic expectations between adults seeking ADHD versus Autism assessment. Methods: This comparative qualitative study analysed expectations from 100 adults referred for ADHD assessment, comparing findings with published Autism data (n=60) from the same Trust. Both samples were of adults referred for assessment rather than diagnostically confirmed cohorts. Two open-ended questions during face-to-face appointments: "What do you hope to gain from the assessment?" and "How do you think receiving a diagnosis would help you?" ADHD responses underwent reflexive thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework, with comparison against published Autism themes. Results: Analysis revealed fundamentally divergent expectation patterns organised around contrasting meta-themes: "Seeking Legitimisation and Practical Solutions" (ADHD) versus "Understanding Self and Explaining Difference" (Autism). Five conceptual dichotomies distinguished pathways: (1) pharmacological versus psychosocial intervention paradigms (47% ADHD mentioned medication versus 1.7% Autism); (2) diagnostic certainty versus depth of understanding (31% ADHD versus 75% Autism seeking understanding); (3) passive hope for understanding versus active educator positioning (3% ADHD versus 63% Autism expecting to explain to others); (4) deficit versus difference self-concepts (15% ADHD used harsh self-descriptors versus 1.7% Autism); (5) internal overwhelm versus social-environmental mismatch phenomenology (10% ADHD described "racing mind" versus 0% Autism). These differences persisted across demographic subgroups. Conclusions: Adults seeking ADHD versus Autism assessment hold fundamentally different expectations requiring differentiated clinical responses. Findings provide empirical evidence for separate rather than combined diagnostic pathways, with condition-specific pre-assessment counselling, post-diagnostic support, and clinical expertise development. Generic 'neurodevelopmental' provision risks meeting no one's actual needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.