ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Establishing core domains in suicide postvention: a Delphi study in Chile.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postvention -structured support for individuals and communities exposed to or bereaved by suicide- is increasingly recognized as a core component of suicide prevention; yet standardized protocols and training frameworks remain scarce, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, leaving healthcare professionals without adequate guidance to respond effectively. Objective: To identify and reach expert consensus on the core domains of suicide postvention to inform a recommendation guide and a training program for healthcare professionals in Chile. Methods: We conducted a Delphi consensus study integrating academic, practice-based, and lived-experience expertise to identify and validate core domains for a postvention guide and online training program. Experts rated items on a five-point Likert scale, and consensus was defined Results: The Delphi panel comprised 28 experts (8 international researchers, 6 national researchers, 3 policymakers, 6 healthcare professionals, and 5 suicide-loss survivors), with 89% retention across two rounds. Consensus was reached on five core domains: (1) the impact of suicide and foundations of postvention; (2) preparedness and immediate response, including safe communication; (3) ongoing response, accompaniment, and recovery; (4) postvention in specific settings (education, workplace, and health services, including support for healthcare teams); and (5) long-term follow-up and prevention. In the complementary focus group (n=5 healthcare professionals), participants endorsed these domains and highlighted the need for early accompaniment within the first days post-suicide, integration of survivor testimonies, and concise asynchronous online modules adapted to the time constraints of public health professionals. Conclusions: Expert consensus on core suicide postvention domains and content provides the foundation for a recommendation guide and training framework designed for scalable implementation across Chile's public health system and adaptable to other Latin American and resource-constrained contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.